bam! so it's actually a sociological theory and not a phenomenal one?ideas · 03 sepanton vidokle, the pool is already therereview · 12 augstefan paulus, non-becomingreview · 09 augalenka zupančič, what if the interregnum is the regnum?study · 11 julliving furniture: beyond poeticsreview · 10 juljane bennett, influx & effluxprose · 05 juljesteringreview · 04 julireland & kronic, cute accelerationismdiscourse · 30 junglykon & gonçalves, metalogosreview · 22 junthe algorithm and the antichrist
the record
seven registers · every piece on the site is one of theseshane denson — reading
—interpretation scaffolding·08 sep 2026·readingread the file →criticism
institutional programme →yearly review programme
a plan that doesn't usually work out02 / presscatalogue systempublisher catalogues
the first full theory catalogue in the world03 / indexevaluative archivewriting rankings
apparently producing results that look quantifiable04 / boardcomparative recordtheorist leaderboards
why is this guy better than that guy?05 / methodcritical protocolreview method & guide
like "stirner's critics" but with less hype06 / guaranteeeditorial standardquality guarantee
what publication and criticism commit tofeatured
marek poliks & roberto alonso trillo, exocapitalism
apparently, empire is the horrible feudal slow sludge that levels your parking lot, whereas capitalism is the genius abstractive vehicle that stratifies only the germs it can see as volatile, creating value in labor?02 / featured file02 jun 2025 — counteranne dufourmantelle, in praise of risk
risk is everywhere, we are simply not present in it, not that we have somehow swallowed risk ontologically and managed to securitize everything.03 / featured file30 jun 2026 — ideaschor pharn lee, the architectures of intelligence and garden empires
pharn lee argues that water is exchanged for intelligence tokens in these premises, but i’d argue metis is more about being allowed to experience the world-interior of capital.index
soft affiliation only — nothing here is a partnershipby author
lukas likavcan
reviews ×2 · planetology→eugene thacker
reviews · horror of philosophy→nick land
counters · platform index→chosen because there is clear favoritism here obviously
click here for the full author index →by publisher
punctum books
forge · □ · cc by-nc-sa 4.0→open humanities press
crypt · ◎ · cc, scholar-led · 2→hyperspekulation
forge · ◎ · open journal · 1→specifically choosing copyleft publishers for this box so that i don’t get sued
click here for the full publisher index →the apparatus
every file is instrumented · the schematic is public- 01
- score — rarely directly argued, largely qualitative social signaling
- 02
- form — one of ten shapes that try to map how the text behaves
- 03
- account — basically, what is it + how long did it take me to read and review + how did i feel?
- 04
- axes — five margins, fixed by form, an attempt at a new structuralism
catalogues
institutional programme →publisher catalogues
the first full theory catalogue in the world. every press worth reading, indexed by imprint, series and year — and revised like very rarely because i'm lazy.
writings
mainline polemic
concept
cartographic splicing
narrative
single focus vision
reviews
literary criticism
article reviews
for smaller pieces
chapter reviews
when one thing is enough
ideas
original interventions
counters
reader response satire
notes
casual eisegesis of the canon
readings
interpretation scaffolding
discourse
getting the last word in
notes
to an extent, being unfair about a dead sacred text is the necessary responsibility of criticism at large. to generate unrelated thoughts about a text, thats what notes are really all about. the difference between marking and noting is that there is no point of noting if your notes look like more of what the text already says
discourse
getting the last word in. or in other words, allowing yourself to speak on top of every other guy, no matter what they think they're on top of. the character of thoughts beats the generation of thought itself, and this wisdom is carried over into every sequential inference. that's what our tradition is built on.
reading
interpretation scaffolding. closer to working through a text than judging it. a lot of it is still positioning, but the theoretical or critical tradition has a messier job than positioning a text, and that is arriving at the point where reading it actually matters. this question can only be answered through a reading, not through reading on its own.
ideas
the healthiest, most wise, most pristine, most natural series. everything orients around a central axis, how can we take what somebody else did, and do something truly new with it? there is nothing more freeing than that. it is truly a time for that one golden philosophy.
counter
reader response satire. written against the object rather than about it. parodying the voice and character of a writing brings it closer not just to a reader experience but to the fundmental meaningful encounter
writings
synkar’s own writing — the only register here not pointed at somebody else. unfortunately, still pointed at everything. but you're in luck, there are ways to reading a text without needing to know its references, and they are now menu options!
review
someone else’s argument, taken apart. or rather, judged, truly judged. but more importantly, truly encountered. that is what makes craft necessary, devotion. and also, bastardization. lots of both.